<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Gabriel Weinberg's Blog - Latest Comments in Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://yegg.disqus.com/</link><description>Startups &amp; stuff...</description><atom:link href="https://yegg.disqus.com/things_about_web_images_i_just_learned/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:02:03 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11498638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just found out that there is really no way to get bicubic scaling on Firefox 2.  Unlike IE6 vs 7/8, however, hardly any Firefox users use v2 anymore, so it is not much of an issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabriel Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:02:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11487999</link><description>&lt;p&gt;That's how I understand it.  The filter actually redraws the image in whatever div or img tag you set it to.  Note that you can do it all with JavaScript, however.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabriel Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 19:54:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11465672</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, wow. So, there's no way for me to apply this to hundreds of images via my stylesheet without specifying every single filename?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iesux</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:28:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11453570</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You need to do the filter per image and you need to add a src='' to the properties, e.g. style="filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(src='filename.ext',sizingMethod='scale')"&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabriel Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:15:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11079569</link><description>&lt;p&gt;PNG8 is much better than that, the problem is that Photoshop's PNG8 support is currently crippled. Adobe fireworks has much better support (as have many open source tools).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;PNG 8 is indeed quantised into, up to, 255 colours just like gif, however unlike gif you can mark _multiple_ entries in the palette as have alpha information (not just 100% transpaent) E.G. it possible to have 16 entries in the palette that go from (RGBA) #FFFFFFFF to #FFFFFF00 and use those for a gradated fadeout. And under IE6 the default behaviour for PNG8 is to render #RRGGBBAA as #NNNNNN00 when AA&amp;lt;ff as="" such="" it="" can="" be="" engineered="" to="" look="" great="" in="" non-ie6="" and="" "ok"="" in="" ie6=""&amp;gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Curt</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:28:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11076753</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have been resizing images dynamically and have never used this CSS class. And they have been working very fine. However, I'll try this technique if it could get me better results.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Maneet Puri</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 01:58:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11028855</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Check out the comments on HN: &lt;a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=660315" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=660315"&gt;http://news.ycombinator.com...&lt;/a&gt;, specifically this one: &lt;a href="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=660469" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=660469"&gt;http://news.ycombinator.com...&lt;/a&gt;.  Short answer it should work on JPEGs if they are saved in a certain way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabriel Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:50:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11028765</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Oops.. is this fix only for pngs? How about jpgs?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iesux</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:47:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11028732</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi there, nice post :) I've linked to it at &lt;a href="http://iesux.tumblr.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://iesux.tumblr.com/"&gt;http://iesux.tumblr.com/&lt;/a&gt; (my IE notes blog). Does the IE6 AlphaImageLoader resizing fix only work for background images? Can I add it to my stylesheet like so:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;img {&lt;br&gt;	filter:progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.AlphaImageLoader(sizingMethod='scale');&lt;br&gt;}&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I tried the above and it didn't work for me. Thanks in advance :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">iesux</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:45:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11028685</link><description>&lt;p&gt;great tips. especially the first one.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;thx&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rizky Syazuli</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 21:43:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11026763</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, I should have originally said IE7+.  I just updated the post with that info and to say that if you want to support IE6 in this manner you need to use AlphaImageLoader (sizingMethod='scale'): &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms532969.aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms532969.aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/e...&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Gabriel Weinberg</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:41:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11024668</link><description>&lt;p&gt;According to MSDN &lt;a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms530822(VS.85,loband).aspx" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms530822(VS.85,loband).aspx"&gt;http://msdn.microsoft.com/e...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;-ms-interpolation-mode is only available in IE 7 onward.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dbugger</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 20:24:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11008918</link><description>&lt;p&gt;WOOT! Philly in the house made it to popurls!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mishoo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 16:32:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Things about Web Images I Just Learned</title><link>http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2009/06/things-about-web-images-i-just-learned.html#comment-11000236</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for a good post. I would like to add a two points:&lt;br&gt;1. personally I always try for "images should be served at the size they are drawn". Image re-size is a costly operation. &lt;br&gt;2. check if a background image with just solid color can be replaced by a 'colored' background. drawing a solid fill is cheaper than rendering an image with solid color.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">sesh</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:18:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>